INVISIBLE CONTRACTS MERCIER CRACK

Question: How do you assign negligence for damages out on the High Seas? No one saw anything happen no one has any evidence that anything happened. In some cases, searching expeditions were sent out to look for the lost ship, and so years would pass between the initial sinking or stealing, and a declaration to the fact that was accepted by all interested parties. It could have been piracy, a Rogue Wave, or the weather, or that the captain and crew made off with the boat to the South Pacific, but in any event, there is no other party to be sued, and no one knows what happened (there were no radios then). No one saw the ship sink, the merchandise is gone for good, the crew is gone as well, and months and years transpire in silence as a ship that was expected to arrive in a foreign port never appears. Whenever high gusts of squall wind came about on the High Seas as merchandise was being shipped from, say, England to India, then many ships were lost at sea. But transportation that crosses over water is very different, indeed. In that way, fault and damages could be properly assigned to the responsible party. For example, on land, goods that were damaged in transit for some reason were generally always recovered from the accident for valuation and insurance adjustment purposes, and eye witnesses were often present to describe how the damage happened, i.e., whether a gust of high winds came along, or some other carriage violated rights-of-way and caused the accident, or that thievery took place. A large portion of business involved the transportation of merchandise from one place to the next.

at least that was the case in the old days when Admiralty was once restricted to govern legitimate business transactions with the King out on the High Seas.Д«ack in the old days, back way early in England's history, our Fathers saw that the rules governing the settlement of grievances that occurred on land just didn't seem to fit right into grievances that merchants had with each other on some Commerce that transpired out on the High Seas. The legal procedure known as ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION applies in Federal areas concerning tax collection, because once a PERSON takes upon any one of the many invisible taxation contracts that the King is enriching his looters through, then ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION as a relational procedure can be invoked by the Judiciary and the King's termites in the IRS to get what they want out of you: Your money.ДЄdmiralty is a subdivision of King's Commerce such that all of King's Commerce that takes place over waterways and the High Seas (at least, such a geographical restriction of Admiralty to navigable waterways of all types is now only theoretical), is assigned to be governed by a special set of grievance settlement and evidentiary rules, just custom tailored to Commerce of that nature. Federal Judges do not call this contract an ADMIRALTY CONTRACT, but my use of this nomenclature occurs by reason of relational identification, because there are invisible financial benefits originating from the King that involve LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY, which is characteristic of ADMIRALTY. A specific ADMIRALTY TAXATION CONTRACT itself. First, the legal procedure of ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION, which is not necessarily related to taxation andДў. I will be discussing two separate items under this section -ДЎ.

INVISIBLE CONTRACTS MERCIER CRACK

Next, we turn now and address the legal procedures used to crack Protesting giblets when an invisible Federal taxation reciprocity contract has been layered on us from that heavy and overweight King we have in Washington, with the administration and enforcement of those invisible contracts falling under a very curt, short, accelerated, and abbreviated legal procedure called ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION. See the file IC-HELP.TXT for additional information and background.Дў.

Words appearing below in ALL CAPS appeared in italics in the original text.

Invisible contracts mercier